The United States Supreme Court rarely addresses trusts and estates issues. The purview of the states, issues arising in intergenerational wealth transfers, are generally outside federal jurisdiction. To reach the U.S. Supreme Court, trusts and estates cases typically involve federal preemption or the constitutionality of a state’s law; the latter has brought the most recent trusts and estates case before the Court.
We posted a blog relating to arbitration agreements – their validity, and their benefits and challenges. Arbitration agreements can be a useful tool for resolving disputes. They can also create a wall preventing resolution in situations best left to the determination of a jury. Many argue that pre-dispute arbitration agreements are unjust; because, how could one know what troubles lay ahead and the related rights they would be relinquishing? Others argue that arbitration is a cost effective and less burdensome alternative to court proceedings.
Long-term care (LTC) facilities frequently use arbitration clauses as a standard part of the admissions process. Whether a mandatory agreement for arbitration is legal is an issue in flux at the moment. Currently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services honor a ban on mandatory arbitration agreements, while the Supreme Court has found that valid arbitration agreements are upheld under the Federal Arbitration Act. Valid arbitration agreements require the bound parties to willingly and competently sign in agreement, or to have an authorized agent sign on their behalf. The parties must also understand what rights they are giving up.
The number one struggle reported by attorneys is the lack of a work-life balance. Whether an attorney is pulling long hours out of necessity, trying to meet their firm’s billing hour requirements, or simply because they enjoy their work, overworking isn’t helpful or healthy. On the contrary, there are numerous studies that show an increase in work hours doesn’t mean an increase in productivity or even profitability.