Changes to Beneficiary Designations During Pendency of Divorce Case

By Jill Roamer, JD, CIPP/US on Nov 23, 2022 10:12:00 AM

Changes to Beneficiary Designations During Pendency of Divorce Case

Divorce is usually a lengthy process of reaching agreements pertaining to assets and family time. Once a divorce case is filed with the court, a temporary injunction is put in place, where neither party can dispose of marital assets. The court will eventually issue its ruling about how assets are divided. But what happens if one party to the divorce changes beneficiary designations to assets while the divorce case is pending but dies before the divorce decree is issued? Do the new designations stand?

Continue Reading

Court Clarifies California Probate Code Section 850

By Jill Roamer, JD, CIPP/US on Nov 18, 2022 11:54:00 AM

Court Clarifies California Probate Code Section 850

California Probate Code 850 is infamously known throughout the state as the basis for a Heggstad Petition, named after the landmark case, Estate of Heggstad. In this case, the Grantor of a revocable living trust had transferred trust property back into his personal name for refinancing purposes. The grantor died before he could transfer the property back into the trust. The court applied Section 850 and allowed a post-humous transfer of the real property back into the revocable trust.

Continue Reading

Separation Agreement Provisions Regarding Beneficiaries Not Enforced

By Jill Roamer, JD, CIPP/US on Nov 4, 2022 11:56:00 AM

Separation Agreement Provisions Blog

Carol and Richard were married for 14 years but separated in 1989. As part of their separation agreement, they each agreed to execute irrevocable wills that named only their two children as beneficiaries of their respective estates. Each party agreed to give a copy of their new will to the other.

Many years thereafter, Carol and Richard both remarried other individuals, and each executed new wills. Carol’s new will left her personal effects to her new husband. If he were to predecease Carol, then her personal effects would be divided between her kids and her new husband’s kids. The residue of Carol’s estate was devised to a revocable trust; Carol and her new husband were grantors of the trust and each retained a general power of appointment to change the beneficial interests of the trust.

Continue Reading
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.